The February employment report was
unambiguously positive. Sure, the labor force participation rate ticked down
0.10% to 63.5%, matching its lowest level in more than 30 years. But that is
not a significant divergence from its average of the last 12 months or so.
Additionally, at 58.6%, the employment-to-population ratio remained among the
lowest of the last 30 years. While low participation and
population-to-employment rates are absolutely cause for long-term concern,
neither figure was materially lower than its average level of the last year and
the economy added 236,000 jobs. As such, the February report, as a single data
point, was certainly positive. Yet the fact remains that the US added
355,000 jobs in the first two months of 2013, about 39% fewer than the 582,000
added during the first two months of 2012. While the first two months of this year are
still subject to revision, it’s unlikely that revisions would add anything
resembling the 227,000 job difference between this year and last year. Additionally,
while the first two months of 2013 appear far better than the first two months
of 2011, when the economy added 265,000 jobs, the economy added 509,000 from
February through April of that year after a weak January. In short, the first
quarter of 2013 is very likely to see fewer jobs added than the first quarter
of 2012 and the economy would have to add 209,500 jobs in each of the next two
months to match the first four months of 2011.
We decided to review the
performance of the employed market since the start of 2011. While the recovery
began in the second half of 2009, the economy continued to lose jobs throughout
the year and the data for 2010 is distorted due to the hiring and layoffs
associated with the decennial census. Over the last 26 months, the economy has
added an average of 179,000 jobs with a median of 170,000. While that wouldn’t
be bad for the tail end of a normal recovery, it’s downright weak given the fact
that the US economy lost 8.736 million
jobs from February 2008 through February 2010. We note that it is not unusual
for the economy to continue to shed jobs early in a recovery or to add jobs in
the early months of a recession. While the economy has added an average of
179,000 per month over the last 26 months, the gains have been erratic, ranging
from 69,000 in January of 2011 to 311,000 in January of 2012. We also note that
the second best month, a gain of 304,000 jobs, occurred in April of 2011, three
months after the lowest figure, and three months ahead of the second lowest. In
short, the US economy has added jobs for 26 consecutive months, but there has
been no discernible trend in the pace of job growth. About all we can say at
this point about February’s employment report is that the number of jobs gained
was the fifth largest in the last 26 months, placing it in the top quintile
over that period.
Another issue to consider is whether the depth of the recession in the 4th
quarter of 2008 and the 1st quarter of 2009 has distorted seasonal adjustments.
These two quarters were by far the worst of the contraction and historically
deep contractions have also witnessed steep recoveries. However, this recovery
has been very shallow. As a result, there have been no large positive quarters
of growth offsetting the steep declines in the 4th quarter of 2008
and the 1st quarter of 2009. ECRI (Economic Cycle Research
Institute) has suggested that this may well be resulting in an upward bias to
seasonal reports during the 4th and 1st quarters of the
year as the recession data is seen by the adjustment process as a permanent
seasonal weakness. This would result in an upward bias in the adjustment
process. In short, the seasonal adjustment process may well be
overcompensating for perceived seasonal weakness, thus making 4th
and 1st quarter data look better than it is. That may well explain
the strength in the 4th and 1st quarters that seems to
dissipate in the 2nd and 3rd quarters.
In a recent article, ECRI noted that to a reasonable method for addressing the possibility that seasonal adjustments are exerting upward pressure on the data is to review annual growth rates, which they did for the employment data (http://www.businesscycle.com/ecri-news-events/news-details/economic-cycle-research-recession-in-the-yo-yo-years). Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have recreated two graphs from ECRI’s article. The graphs indicate the annual change in total non-farm payrolls and the annual change in the household survey. The former is used to determine the number of jobs gained or lost while the latter is used to determine the unemployment rate. Both data sets indicate that year-over-year employment growth is slowing. Year-over-year growth in non-farm payrolls peaked in February of last year at 1.9%, with a gain this past February, which is subject to revision, of 1.5%. Meanwhile, the household survey indicates a more significant weakening of employment growth. After peaking at 2.2% in June of 2012, it has declined significantly since last October, registering a gain of 1% year-over-year in February.
In a recent article, ECRI noted that to a reasonable method for addressing the possibility that seasonal adjustments are exerting upward pressure on the data is to review annual growth rates, which they did for the employment data (http://www.businesscycle.com/ecri-news-events/news-details/economic-cycle-research-recession-in-the-yo-yo-years). Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have recreated two graphs from ECRI’s article. The graphs indicate the annual change in total non-farm payrolls and the annual change in the household survey. The former is used to determine the number of jobs gained or lost while the latter is used to determine the unemployment rate. Both data sets indicate that year-over-year employment growth is slowing. Year-over-year growth in non-farm payrolls peaked in February of last year at 1.9%, with a gain this past February, which is subject to revision, of 1.5%. Meanwhile, the household survey indicates a more significant weakening of employment growth. After peaking at 2.2% in June of 2012, it has declined significantly since last October, registering a gain of 1% year-over-year in February.
The February employment report
was unambiguously positive, yet it remains to be seen whether the US job market
is establishing a trend toward a strong employment market. The job market
showed similar signs of improvement early in 2011 and 2012 only to slow
significantly through the middle of the year and then strengthen once again
late in the year. We are not suggesting that employment is rolling over. On the
other hand, talk of a strengthening job market that will support growth in
consumer spending is premature and the job market may indeed be weakening. In
short, evidence suggests caution in counting on a strengthening employment
market as a trigger for a deeper, healthier expansion.